There is a lot of conversation around various sources of pollution but many of them have no context so you really can’t get a mental grip on how serious the problem really is.  Below is a chart we built with data collected by the University of Calgary.  We hope it will help you put things in perspective.

This data is specific to Canada in 2015 and while the numbers are shown in the outermost ring and in the table below, we believe that most cold climate first world countries will have very similar ratios in other countries.  The one notable exception may be the MINING & UPSTREAM OIL & GAS segment shown at the very top of the outer ring.  That segment is likely smaller in other countries like the UK, Argentina and the United States.

CLICK TO ENLARGE

Carbon Emissions by Source - Canada 2015

 

EnergyStationary CombustionMining & Upstream Oil & Gas Production105253
Public Electricity & Heat83703
Manufacturing43093
Residential (Heating)43037
Commercial & Industrial30515
Other21055
TransportationRoad Transportation144058
Off-Road Transportation & Pipeline39078
Air, Rail & Marine19069
Fugitive SourcesVenting30820
Other20958
Agriculture58952
IPPU51067
Waste24699
Categories: CanadaEnergy

2 Comments

James · January 30, 2019 at 3:29 pm

Are the numbers literally kilotonnes of carbon? I’ve read that methane emissions are worse for the environment then carbon dioxide emissions. I guess CH4(methane) and CO2(carbon dioxide) would have the same amount of carbon.

    Ian Matthews · February 2, 2019 at 6:03 pm

    These numbers were taken from the Canadian Federal Government by the UofC. I read (likely the same articles as you) in the Daily Oil Bulletin this week about Methane. I think the argument for tracking Carbon is that Carbon is a product generally agreed to be the “culprit” these days and even if Carbon itself it not a big problem, it is a valid proxy for things like CH4 (methane) that are ‘bad’. Meaning that if you reduce carbon output you are likely reducing many other things as well, including particulate matter and dangerous fugitive gases.

Leave a Reply

Avatar placeholder

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *